3
$\begingroup$

I'm currently investigating mortality rates in my local area compared to England.

Mortality rates in my local area have always been higher than England however recently I've noticed a widening gap between them, with mortality rates in England continuing to decrease over the years but increasing in my local area.

I wanted to investigate potential contributing factors to this widening gap over time, such as deprivation. I'm working with the assumption the amount of deprivation in my local area has not changed over time but I want to see if the more deprived parts of my local community are contributing to this mortality increase more than those less deprived areas and so community work can be focused where necessary.

I thought about creating a line graph for each deprivation level and comparing the slope of these lines. But I was wondering if there were any statistical tests that could be done to help answer this question.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ When you say mortality rates, are those actual rates (e.g., 1 in a 1000 death), or a count? And what is deprivation? Of food? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 22 at 16:40
  • $\begingroup$ Yes like deaths per 100,000 population. Deprivation is defined as level of poverty - this is measured using a score from 1-10. Each area is given a score. My suggestion above is a line for each deprivation level 1 to 10. $\endgroup$
    – Laura
    Commented Jul 23 at 8:25

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You could consider the number of deaths out of the total number of inhabitants to be a binomial process. You can then use a regression model with deprivation as an explanatory variable, to see whether higher values of deprivation correspond to an increase in the average mortality rate.

Suppose your data is called DF and looks like this:

area year deaths depriv
England 2024 982 0.1
... ... ...

with deaths representing the number of deaths per $100,\!000$.

In R, you could fit a binomial GLM to estimate the relationship between deprivation (depriv) and the probability of death like so:

GLM <- glm(cbind(deaths, 1e5 - deaths) ~ depriv,
           family = "binomial", data = DF)

You can also try to include other effects, like a regression spline for the effect of year:

require("splines")
GLM <- glm(cbind(deaths, 1e5 - deaths) ~ depriv + ns(year, 5),
           family = "binomial", data = DF)

After that, you can use summary for a standard regression table, emmeans for comparisons and a marginal effects plot to see visualize the estimated effect of deprivation on the mortality rate.

In the same manner, you could add other potentially confounding variables.

This is actually a major challenge in what you're trying to do. It is easy to see how two variables are marginally correlated to each other. But why two variables correlate is a much harder question. You'll have to decide on which variables to include in the model.

Finally, it is also possible to correct for the fact that some cities just happen to have higher mortality rates than others. One way is by including all variables that might affect this (like size), and another is by including a random effect for area, by using a mixed model.


Edit: If you want to know whether the effect of deprivation changes over time, you could add an interaction term (*). This term tells you how the slope of depriv depends on year:

GLM <- glm(cbind(deaths, 1e5 - deaths) ~ depriv * time, 
           family = "binomial", data = DF)
$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Yes I did think about using the regression model. However wouldn't this produce a model which considered data across the time period i.e. addressing if deprivation levels contribute towards mortality overall. Whereas I want to investigate if deprivation is having more of an impact on mortality rates now (as the gap between mortality rates in England and by local area is starting to widen) compared to when the gap remained approximately consistent previously. $\endgroup$
    – Laura
    Commented Jul 25 at 12:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Laura If you want to investigate whether deprivation has a greater impact as time progresses, you can use a linear effect of time and estimate an interaction between time and deprivation., i.e.: depriv * year. I'll add that in an edit. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 25 at 12:44
  • $\begingroup$ Oh yeah thats true. Didn't think of this. Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Laura
    Commented Jul 25 at 13:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Laura You're welcome! If you found the answer helpful, you can vote on it and accept it. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 25 at 14:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.