I calculated the waist-to-hip ratio from, well, waist and hip measurements in cm. The ratio's values would come out in the range of 0.8-1.1, for my population.
When I performed a univariate cox proportional hazards regression for the time to incidence of diabetes, I got a stupidly high hazard ratio: 146.4. The risk ratios for my other variables are all well within 0.5-to-5 at most.
The last time something like this occurred, I had a very, very small hazard ratio (which is pretty much the same as a big one, I guess). The result was significant. HbA1c was recorded as decimal values instead of a percentage. So I multiplied it by 100, and the hazard ratio was interpretable, and the resultant p-value still fell within significance. (I got this idea from another StackExchange answer). I didn't understand why that worked then, and I don't understand why it isn't working now.
146.4, with p-value 0.0004, is now 1.03481, with p-value 0.78. Can anybody help me develop some intuition for what's going on here?
I'm using R with packages survminer and survMisc, if that makes any difference.